In what case did the Supreme Court rule that suspects must be informed of their rights before police questioning?

The correct response identifies the case of Miranda v. Arizona as the landmark decision in which the Supreme Court established that suspects must be informed of their rights before any police questioning can occur. This case, decided in 1966, arose when Ernesto Miranda was arrested and interrogated without being informed of his right to remain silent or to have an attorney present. The Court ruled that the Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination necessitates that individuals in custody must be made aware of their rights. This ruling laid the groundwork for what are now known as "Miranda rights," requiring law enforcement to clearly communicate these rights at the beginning of an interrogation. This pivotal ruling ensures that suspects can make informed choices regarding their participation in police questioning, safeguarding their constitutional rights.