In what scenario does consent to sexual acts become irrelevant in Minnesota law concerning sexual conduct?

Consent to sexual acts becomes irrelevant in Minnesota law concerning sexual conduct when there is a position of authority involved. This means that if one person holds a position of power or authority over the other—such as a teacher over a student, an employer over an employee, or a doctor over a patient—consent is not considered valid. The inherent power dynamic in these relationships can compromise the ability of the subordinate party to give genuine consent.

This legal principle aims to protect individuals who may be vulnerable due to the influence or control exerted by those in authority, recognizing that genuine consent cannot be freely given in such circumstances. Thus, even if the complainant is of legal age, this specific context renders consent irrelevant and leads to a different legal consideration altogether.