What happens if a tape recorder fails during a police interrogation?

The situation in which a tape recorder fails during a police interrogation is addressed by legal standards concerning the admissibility of statements. When a recording fails, it does not automatically invalidate or render all statements made during that interrogation inadmissible. Instead, the key consideration is whether the statements were made voluntarily and reasonably under the circumstances.

If the statements were made in a manner that does not suggest coercion or impropriety, they can still be admissible in court despite the lack of a recording. The reliance on the reasonable nature of the circumstances acknowledges that a technical failure does not negate the validity of the content disclosed by the interrogated individual.

Thus, the correct answer reflects the principle that as long as the statements were made in good faith and there is no evidence suggesting they were coerced or improperly obtained, they can still be presented in court. The emphasis is placed on the quality of the interrogation process over the technical reliability of recording equipment.