What must be demonstrated to legally stop a vehicle according to MN v Pike?

In the context of the Minnesota case MN v Pike, the legal threshold for stopping a vehicle requires the officer to have specific grounds that justify the stop. In this particular case, it was established that the presence of a traffic violation is what legally allows law enforcement to initiate a stop. This is rooted in the principle that police officers must have probable cause or reasonable suspicion based on observed behavior or conditions that indicate a violation of the law.

While revocation of a driver's license may provide grounds to stop a vehicle, it does not encompass the broader legal standard applicable in Minnesota. The law heavily emphasizes that a valid traffic stop must always be underpinned by observable evidence of a violation, such as running a red light or speeding. Similarly, evidence of reckless driving or suspicious behavior could potentially lead to a lawful stop, but they too would generally stem from an observed traffic violation rather than solely relying on the status of a driver's license.

Therefore, the presence of a traffic violation remains the primary justification for stopping a vehicle in Minnesota, aligning with the standards set forth in the Minnesota case law.