What must happen if a court specified in a warrant is not in session?

When a warrant specifies a particular court but that court is not in session, the appropriate legal procedure requires that the defendant must be brought before a judge within a specified timeframe, which is typically 36 hours. This requirement ensures that the defendant's rights are protected and that they have the opportunity to be informed of the charges against them and to have a hearing.

The timeliness of bringing the defendant before a judge is crucial in the legal process, as it upholds the principles of due process and prevents unnecessary detention. This 36-hour period is often dictated by legal statutes and serves to balance the need for judicial oversight with the practical availability of court sessions.

Other options propose outcomes that do not conform with established legal standards. Immediate release or waiting until the next court session would not fulfill the requirement for timely judicial review. The choice of court is also generally not an option for the defendant in this context, as specific legal protocols must be followed based on the warrant issued.