When is deadly force prohibited for peace officers?

The prohibition of deadly force for peace officers is clearly established in situations where the use of excessive force is not justified, particularly concerning methods such as choke holds that have not been authorized by law. Law enforcement agencies have specific guidelines and policies that dictate appropriate use of force, and if a technique, like a choke hold, is deemed unauthorized, its application would be considered unlawful. This means that using such a method could result in serious harm or death, which is why it is classified under the circumstances where deadly force is prohibited.

In addition, the context of authorized use of specific techniques is critical to ensuring accountability and the preservation of life, which underscores the necessity for officers to adhere to training standards and legal frameworks when applying force. When an action or a maneuver like an unauthorized choke hold is employed, it tends to violate these standards, thereby necessitating the prohibition of deadly force in such circumstances.

The other options touch on situations that encompass broader discussions around the use of force but do not highlight specific legal constraints regarding unauthorized techniques and their implications on the use of deadly force.