Which of the following scenarios does NOT constitute aggravated robbery?

Aggravated robbery typically involves circumstances that elevate the severity of the robbery charge compared to a standard robbery. These circumstances often include the use of a weapon, actual threats to the victim, or actions that imply the presence of a weapon, thereby putting the victim in fear for their safety.

In the scenario where robbery occurs without any threats or aggressive implications, it does not meet the criteria for aggravated robbery. In this case, the absence of threats or weapon use means the act does not escalate to a level considered aggravated under the law. This is why it is correctly identified as the answer that does not constitute aggravated robbery.

The other scenarios listed involve elements that typically qualify as aggravated robbery. Being armed during a robbery significantly increases the potential danger to victims and society, while verbal threats create fear and elevate the crime's seriousness. Implying possession of a weapon similarly contributes to a heightened state of threat, even if no weapon is directly presented. Thus, these actions reflect a significant level of danger and intention that would qualify them as aggravated robbery.